@scin, thanks for your unethical and unprofessional response. First of all when a paper comes to public domain everybody is entitled to look into the paper and extend their comments. If you are a real scientist prove that they are not same. We have analysed further and high resolution photographs are there for your analysis. Please stop giving us advice in favour of a bunch of people who are fabricating the data day and night. It is called as scientific plagiarism. It is a criminal offence. SKS has used public money to make fun of the scientific world. Most of his papers are rubbish. What do you mean by personal issues? Do you want to project that fabricated published data are personal issues? Do you mean to say that SCIENCE belongs to SKS only! Our job is not to do science but also to dig into unethical cooked data and carry out the mission to a logical end. I hope you understand us. The papers should be retracted by the request of the Authors. If it happens to be retracted at the request of editor that will look horrible. We are really amused to find your advocacy for SKS group when almost 45 fabricated data surfaced. Be patient and watch out what is happening next!